EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF LAPAROSCOPIC HIGH LIGATION ON VARICOCELE: INSIGHTS INTO EFFECTIVE TREATMENT OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.03.01.0380Keywords:
Varicocele, Infertility, Laparoscopic ligation, scrotal painAbstract
BACKGROUND: Varicocele is an abnormal dilatation of the pampiniform plexus commonly presenting as dull testicular pain in young adults. It is associated with primary infertility in 35% of men. Surgery is the definitive treatment of varicocele. Laparoscopic high ligation is a minimally invasive technique and is especially useful in bilateral cases and when combined with other abdominal surgery. Post-operative complications include testicular atrophy, hydrocele formation and recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and report the initial experience of laparoscopic high ligation of varicocele, assess postoperative complications, determine recurrence rates, and measure the efficacy in improving symptoms among patients.
METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted at General Surgery Department Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, from March 2018 to April 2021. A total of 57 patients with grade II & III varicocele were selected for laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The patients were followed up for 6 months with a physical examination, Visual analog scale, and ultra-sonographic scanning for persistent pain, hydrocele formation and recurrence of varicocele. Post-stratification Chi-square test was used with P-value <0.05.
RESULTS: The mean age was 34.2±6 years (range 15–42 years). Unilateral varicocele was presenting 54(94.7%) patients with left 49(85.9%) and right 5(8.77%). Bilateral were found in 3(5.26%) cases. The varicocele was grade III in 42(73.68%) and grade II in 15(26.31%) patients. The preoperative mean visual analog scale score was 4.7 and the postoperative pain at 6 months was 0.7. After the surgery, 48(84.2%) patients had significant improvement in their pain scores (p <.001), while 7(12.28%) had mild improvement and 2 (3.5%) remained unchanged. No recurrence and hydrocele was found at 6 months follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is effective in the treatingt symptomatic varicoceles with reduced complications and good post-operative pain relief.
KEY WORDS: Varicocele, Infertility, Laparoscopic ligation, scrotal pain.
References
De Los Reyes T, Locke J, Afshar K. Varicoceles in the pediatric population: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2017 Jan;11(1-2Suppl1):S34.
Cimador M, Castagnetti M, Gattuccio I, Pensabene M, Sergio M, De Grazia E. The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele. Nature Reviews Urology. 2012 May;9(5):247-57.
Paradiso FV, Mason EJ, Nanni L. Antegrade sclerotherapy to treat all types of varicoceles in the pediatric population: experience of a single center. Urology. 2016 Dec 1;98:149-53.
Motta A, Caltabiano G, Pizzarelli M, Failla G, Botezatu D, Muresanu H, Foti P, La Vignera S, Condorelli R, Palmucci S, Basile A. Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization. La radiologia medica. 2019 May 1; 124:438-43.
Rabe E, Breu FX, Cavezzi A, Smith PC, Frullini A, Gillet JL, Guex JJ, Hamel-Desnos C, Kern P, Partsch B, Ramelet AA. European guidelines for sclerotherapy in chronic venous disorders. Phlebology. 2014 Jul;29(6):338-54.
Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Alternate indications for varicocele repair: non-obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction. Fertility and sterility. 2011 Dec 1;96(6):1288-93.
Chung SD, Wu CC, Lin VC, Ho CH, Yang SS, Tsai YC. Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience. World journal of surgery. 2011 Aug;35:1785-90.
Kachrilas S, Popov E, Bourdoumis A, Akhter W, El Howairis M, Aghaways I, Masood J, Buchholz N. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2014 Jul;18(3).
Światłowski Ł, Pyra K, Kuczyńska M, Kuklik E, Sobstyl J, Sojka M, Drelich-Zbroja A, Pech M, Powerski M, Jargiełło T. Selecting patients for embolization of varicoceles based on ultrasonography. Journal of Ultrasonography. 2018 Jun 29;18(73):90-5.
Waalkes R, Manea IF, Nijman JM. Varicocele in adolescents: a review and guideline for the daily practice. Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Dec 1;65(10):859-71.
Basile A, Failla G, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Calogero A, Vicari E, Granata A, Mundo E, Caltabiano G, Pizzarelli M, Messina M. Left spermatic vein retrograde sclerosis: comparison between sclerosant agent injection through a diagnostic catheter versus through an occluding balloon catheter. La radiologia medica. 2015 May;120:483-8.
Kolon TF. Evaluation and management of the adolescent varicocele. The Journal of urology. 2015 Nov 1;194(5):1194-201.
Salama N, Blgozah S. Immediate development of post-varicocelectomy hydrocele: a case report and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2014 Dec;8(1):1-4.
Sepúlveda L, Coimbra D, Lourenço M, Santos L, Oliveira C, Coutinho S, Ramos M. Varicocele treatment in patients up to 35 years old: a multicentric retrospective study comparing 3 different techniques. Archivos españoles de urología. 2018;71(6):543-8.
Malekzadeh S, Fraga-Silva RA, Morère PH, Sorega A, Produit S, Stergiopulos N, Constantin C. Varicocele percutaneous embolization outcomes in a pediatric group: 7-year retrospective study. International urology and nephrology. 2016 Sep;48:1395-9.
Sepúlveda L, Coimbra D, Lourenço M, Santos L, Oliveira C, Coutinho S, Ramos M. Varicocele treatment in patients up to 35 years old: a multicentric retrospective study comparing 3 different techniques. Archivos españoles de urología. 2018;71(6):543-8.
Kachrilas S, Popov E, Bourdoumis A, Akhter W, El Howairis M, Aghaways I, Masood J, Buchholz N. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2014 Jul;18(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siddique Ahmad, dr. Saadia muhammad, Dr. Iftikhar, Dr. Muhammad Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purposes. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png)
