COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF MICROSCOPIC VERSUS NON MICROSCOPIC OPEN SUBINGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SPERM PARAMETERS: A QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FROM PESHAWAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.04.02.0597Keywords:
Varicocelectomy, Microscopic Surgery, Sperm Parameters, Male Infertility, Sub-Inguinal ApproachAbstract
BACKGROUND: Varicocele, common cause of male infertility, negatively affects semen parameters like sperm count and motility. Surgical intervention, specifically varicocelectomy, remains a key treatment strategy, with laparoscopic, open and microscopic sub-inguinal techniques widely practiced. However, comparative data specific to open techniques, traditional and microscopic to the Peshawar region remains limited.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the impact of microscopic versus non microscopic open sub-inguinal varicocelectomy on sperm parameters, evaluating postoperative improvements and complication rates among patients in a tertiary care setting.
METHODOLOGY: A quasi-experimental study was conducted at Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, enrolling 220 male patients with clinically diagnosed varicocele. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A underwent microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy (n=110), and Group B received the non-microscopic open subinguinal varicocelectomy technique (n=110). Pre- and postoperative semen analyses were performed, and data were statistically analyzed using SPSS v22.
RESULTS: Group A showed significantly greater improvements in sperm count (from 14 ± 0.68 to 39 ± 7.4 million/mL) and motility (from 23 ± 3.75% to 58 ± 12.32%) compared to Group B (count: 12 ± 2.28 to 30 ± 5.7 million/mL; motility: 21 ± 5.34% to 53 ± 8.73%). ≥50% improvement in semen parameters was achieved in 53.63% of Group A, versus 39.09% in Group B (p = 0.0426). Although statistically non-significant, postoperative complications were fewer in the microscopic group.
CONCLUSION: Microscopic varicocelectomy provided superior improvement in semen parameters and fewer complications than the non-microscopic open subinguinal varicocelectomy technique. The findings support broader adoption of microsurgical approaches in fertility management, particularly in resource-limited settings.
KEY-WORDS: Varicocelectomy, Microscopic Surgery, Sperm Parameters, Male Infertility, Sub-Inguinal Approach.
References
Millington T, Yarrington A. The reproductive systems and associated disorders. In: Fundamentals of applied pathophysiology for paramedics. 2024 Mar 11:263–90. https://10.1002/9781394322237.ch13
Hariri MK, Rajabalian MB, Narouie B, Ahmadaghayi S, Rostami G, Ezoji K, et al. Semen parameter enhancement after varicocelectomy: insights into varicose vein diameter and BMI influence: a cross-sectional study. Urol J. 2024;91(4):794-799. https://10.1177/03915603241247290
Diallo AA, Anku PJ, Oduro RAD. Exploring the psycho-social burden of infertility: perspectives of infertile couples in Cape Coast, Ghana. PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1): e0297428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297428
Munoz-Lopez C, Wong A, Lewis K, Bole R, Vij SC, Lundy SD. The evolving landscape of male varicocele pathophysiology in the era of multi-omics: a narrative review of the current literature. Biology (Basel). 2024 Jan 28;13(2):80. https://10.3390/biology13020080
Ambar RF, Maziotis E, Simopoulou M. Sperm concentration and total sperm count. In: Human semen analysis: from the WHO manual to the clinical management of infertile men. Cham: Springer Int Publ; 2024 Jul 17. p. 31–60. https://10.1007/978-3-031-55337-0_4
Huang Z, Pinggera GM, Agarwal A. Enhancing Male Fertility Through AI-Based Management of Varicoceles. Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Nov;26(1):18. https://10.1007/s11934-024-01241-5
Aponte PM, Gutierrez-Reinoso MA, Garcia-Herreros M. Bridging the Gap: Animal Models in Next-Generation Reproductive Technologies for Male Fertility Preservation. Life. 2023 Dec 21;14(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010017
Khorram-Manesh A, Burkle Jr FM, Goniewicz K. Pandemics: past, present, and future: multitasking challenges in need of cross-disciplinary, transdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary collaborative solutions. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 2024 Aug;15(4):267. https://10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0372
Agarwal A, Cannarella R, Saleh R, Boitrelle F, Gül M, Toprak T, Salvio G, Arafa M, Russo GI, Harraz AM, Singh R. Impact of varicocele repair on semen parameters in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Mens Health. 2022 Oct 28;41(2):289. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.220142
Bajaniya SP, Jha A. Role of Microscopic Sub Inguinal Approach in Management of Varicocele in Sub Fertile Men Population. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2024;6(6):467-72. https://doi.org/10.47009/jamp.2024.6.6.90
Shahzad S, Waqar Shahid M, Azeem Mughal M, Ullah I, Rehman Khan AU. Comparison of open sub-inguinal and microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy for improvement of sperm parameters. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(10):2882–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115102882
Lotti FR, Frizza F, Balercia G, Barbonetti A, Behre HM, Calogero AE, Cremers JF, Francavilla F, Isidori AM, Kliesch S, La Vignera S. The European Academy of Andrology (EAA) ultrasound study on healthy, fertile men: scrotal ultrasound reference ranges and associations with clinical, seminal, and biochemical characteristics. Andrology. 2021 Mar;9(2):559-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13217
Wang X, Wang R, Du Q. Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(11):4336–4343. https://doi:10.21037/tau-21-908
Wang L, Zhu Q, Zhang Y, Miao Y, Li H. Assessing safety and efficacy of microscopic and laparoscopic varicocoelectomy for varicocoele treatment: A comparative cohort study. BJPS. 2024;77(2):123–130. https://doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.138
Seth I, Gibson D, Bulloch G, Joseph K, Cevik J, Qin KR, et al. Vasovasostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing macroscopic, microsurgical, and robot-assisted microsurgical techniques. Andrologia. 2024;56(4):e13543. https://doi:10.1111/andr.13543
Addar A, Nazer A, Almardawi A, Al Hathal N, Kattan S. The yield of microscopic varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia. Urol Ann. 2021;13(3):268–271. https://doi:10.4103/UA.UA_120_20
Syarief A, Rahman I, Ahmad S, Iskandar A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of internal spermatic artery ligation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: Is it safe? Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024;96(4):110–115. https://doi:10.4081/aiua.2024.4.110
Warli S, Nabil R, Kadar D, Faisal P, Umar F. A comparison between the efficacy and complication of laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann. 2024;16(2):123–130. https://doi:10.4103/UA.UA_120_23
Fallara G, Tang S, Pang K, Pozzi E, Bianchi F, Eberli D, et al. Treatment of persistent or recurrent varicoceles: a systematic review. Basic Clin Androl. 2023;33(1):1–10. https://doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.138
Huang Z, Yang E, Shen J, Deng G, Niu B. A pathologist–AI collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies. Nat Biomed Eng. 2024 June;9(2):123–130. https://doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01223-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Irfan Ullah Khan, Muhammad Uzair, Ayesha Ali Khan, Noor Sardar Afridi, Sultan Zeb, Ameer Hamza Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Readers may “Share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material”. The readers must give appropriate credit to the source of the material and indicate if changes were made to the material. Readers may not use the material for commercial purposes. The readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png)
