A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY COMPARING TAILORED AND CONVENTIONAL LATERAL INTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHRONIC ANAL FISSURES

Authors

  • Mir Wais Mir Wais Department of Surgery, Muhammad Teaching Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Shahana Rehman Department of Surgery, Muhammad Teaching Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ghulam Younas Khan Department of Surgery, Muhammad Teaching Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.04.03.0616

Keywords:

Anal fissures, Conventional lateral internal Sphincterotomy, Tailored lateral internal Sphincterotomy, LIS, faecal incontinence, flatus incontinence

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal fissure is defined as a superficial tear in the skin distal to the dentate line and is one of the leading causes of hospitalization among proctologic disorders. Anal fissures are initially managed by conservative treatments, but have limited efficacy and may need surgical interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Conventional lateral internal Sphincterotomy (LIS) versus tailored LIS in terms of pain, bleeding and recurrent symptoms as outcomes.

METHODOLOGY: The prospective cohort study was carried out at Muhammad Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, including n=196 participants, diagnosed with Chronic anal fissures, over the age of 18 years, through informed consent. Patients were assessed for pain, bleeding, and recurrent symptoms pre-operatively and post-operatively at one-month intervals of follow-up.

RESULTS: The Mean age of the participants was 34.50±11.18 years, including 52 (26.5%) males and 144 (73.5%), operated with Conventional LIS 94 (48%), and tailored LIS 102 (52%). Post-operative pain was significantly reduced, P<0.001 in both groups, with no difference P=0.182, between interventions. For flatus incontinence Significant difference by Fisher’s exact test P=0.028 reported between interventions, with a relative risk RR= 0.204 (CI 0.045-0.923), 0.039 for tailored LIS. For faecal incontinence, Fisher's exact test P=0.011 was significant between groups, and RR=0.070 (CI 0.004-1.242), P=0.070 was insignificant. Faecal soiling P=0.108, recurrent symptoms P=0.152, post-operative constipation P=0.124, and pruritus P=0.030 did not report significant differences among treatment groups when conventional LIS was compared with tailored LIS.

CONCLUSION: Conventional LIS and tailored LIS were both effective in post-operative pain and bleeding reduction. Tailored LIS helped reduce post-operative flatus and faecal incontinence. The study was limited by a short follow-up duration and insufficient consideration of patients’ medical histories and comorbidities.

KEYWORDS: Anal fissures, Conventional lateral internal Sphincterotomy, Tailored lateral internal Sphincterotomy, LIS, faecal incontinence, flatus incontinence.

References

Siddiqui J, Fowler GE, Zahid A, Brown K, Young CJ. Treatment of anal fissure: a survey of surgical practice in Australia and New Zealand. Colorectal Dis. 2018;21:226–233.

https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14466

Riboni C, Selvaggi L, Cantarella F, Podda M, Bracchitta S, Mosca V, Cosenza A, Cosenza V, Selvaggi F, Nardo B, et al. Anal Fissure and Its Treatments: A Historical Review. J. Clin. Med.2024 ;13:3930–3930. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133930

Salati SA. Anal Fissure – an extensive update. Pol. J. Surg. 2021;93:1–5. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.7879

Balla A, Saraceno F, Shalaby M, Gallo G, Salomone Di Saverio, Paola De Nardi, Perinotti R, Pierpaolo Sileri, Bourguiba Mohamed Aboulkacem, Tewodros Abule, et al. Surgeons’ practice and preferences for the anal fissure treatment: results from an international survey. UPIS 2023;75:2279–2290.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01661-x.

Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoglu, Sozen I, İsmail Zihni, Celik G, Turan B, Acar S, İsa Karaca, Demet Gunduz. Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2024;30.

https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.944127

Aktaş H, Şener Bahçe Z. Evaluation of the Incidence of Anal Fissures in Patients Who Systemic Isotretinoin Therapy for Acne. Dermatol. pract. concept. 2023;12:e2023133.

https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1303a133

Ali A, Muhammad I, Zafar IB, Hina Qayum, Ullah NI, Nawaz H. Anal Fissures; regional epidemiology, symptomatic presentation, interval and quality of life. KJMS [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 2];16:120–124. https://doi.org/10.70520/kjms.v16i3.367

Gökçek E, Gökçe R, Kaçar CK. The effect of Caudal Epidural Injection on healing in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. J. Medicine. 2023 Sept 15;102(37):e35160.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035160

El Muhtaseb MS, Salameh M, Al-Mikhi B, Abed Alfattah A, Hamsho F, Braizat Z, Alsheikh F, Khouri D, Haimour S, Addasi R, et al. Depression and anxiety among chronic anal fissure patients. Int. J. Surg. Open. 2022;46:100518.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100518.

Navarro-Sánchez A, Luri-Prieto P, Compañ-Rosique A, Navarro-Ortiz R, Berenguer-Soler M, Gil-Guillén VF, Cortés-Castell E, Navarro-Cremades F, Gómez-Pérez L, Pérez-Tomás C, et al. Sexuality, Quality of Life, Anxiety, Depression, and Anger in Patients with Anal Fissure. A Case–Control Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4401.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194401.

Bhama AR, Zoccali MB, Chapman BC, Davids JS, Eisenstein S, Fish DR, Sherman KL, Simianu VV, Zaghiyan KN. Practice Variations in Chemodenervation for Anal Fissure Among American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeon, Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;64:1167–1171.

https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000002194.

Boland PA, Kelly ME, Donlon NE, Bolger JC, Larkin JO, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH. Management options for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:1807–1815.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4.

Acar T, Acar N, Güngör F, Kamer E, Güngör H, Candan MS, Bağ H, Tarcan E, Dilek ON, Haciyanli M. Treatment of chronic anal fissure: Is open lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) a safe and adequate option? Asian J Surg. 2019;42:628–633.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.10.001.

Lee K-H, Hyun K, Yoon S-G, Lee J-K. Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS? Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37:275–280.

https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00976.0139.

Iida Y, Honda K, Iida R, Saitou H, Munemoto Y, Tanaka A, Tanaka H. Modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy with sliding skin graft for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis: Low recurrence rate and no serious faecal incontinence postoperative complication. J Visc Surg. 2022;159:267–272.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.07.002.

Trieu RQ, Mazor Y, Prott G, Jones MP, Kellow JE, Schnitzler M, Malcolm A. Flatus Incontinence and Fecal Incontinence: A Case-Control Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000002422.

Ibrahim R, Abounozha S, Mohamedahmed AYY, Alawad A, Abdel Rahim A. Incidence of anal incontinence among patients with anal fissure treated with Botox injection versus lateral sphincterotomy. Ann. med. surg. (2012) . 2021;68:102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102636.

Published

09/30/2025

How to Cite

A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY COMPARING TAILORED AND CONVENTIONAL LATERAL INTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHRONIC ANAL FISSURES. (2025). NORTHWEST JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.69723/njms.04.03.0616